Hey, I'm posting a bit of scenario I've worked on in my game but with an eye to keeping the BARE essentials so that it reads easier. I'm wondering if you think:
- the idea is too far flung.
- if it seems like it could build tension effectively.
Because it's very easy to overintellectualize a plot, I want to keep this as effective as possible prior to any addition of symbolism. So here goes:
Setting: A republic, and the oldest civilization in the game world. While modern in governance, deep social baggage from past hierarchies. In the past the government possessed a different format: it was composed of a four-way aristocratic rulership: the sword, shield, voice, and intellect. These four figures collectively ruled the government as one being, and inherited the 'throne' through adoption from the aristocratic and priestly castes (the intellect and voice coming from the priestly, the sword and shield coming from the aristocratic). Each member served a different role in balancing the 'spiritual' aspect of the other. Since a botched revolution, the country gradually stabilized into republicanism.
In the world of today, there is a staunch 'communist' faction that serves as consistent opposition to the ways of old. They believe the modern republic to be doing a terrible job at managing inequities.
Events: So the mystery of this scenario is initiated by the collective assassination of each master of every regional combat school. They are all effectively assassinated. The government enlists your aid in discovering the culprit- of course, they are very strong to have killed each one. You get the opportunity to have a party member join you in aiding your search- this party member being a government aide. Of course, everybody suspects the communist faction for they are the most 'anti-tradition' and encourage the liberal use of new technologies with certain reservations.
You meet the head of the communist faction, and he has no idea who could have done this and even fears the possible outcomes. Of course he 'welcomes' their demise, but understands that if his faction has not done it, whoever has is certain to be feared. Your new party member butts heads with him though, driving a wedge between the two that exacerbates your ability to find the killer of these folks.
Dramatic tension and resolution: As it turns out though, the one who killed them all was historically the last sword of the old government- preserved alive for this moment (A LOT of plot behind this). The irony is that the person most likely to 'preserve' the old ways is responsible for the purest representation of the same. He and the communist leader get into a debate about what the future and the 'best' way to live entails. The communist leader realizes that even the sword does not think too differently, but is shattered by disillusionment. After dealing with the last sword he joins you so that he can learn more- also leading to character development between him and the member who joined earlier.
____
To those who read through the whole thing, do you think that it sports an effective 'arc'? Do I need more information about the reaction of other characters to 'make it work' (which I plan on doing)? Is it too 'far-flung' to take seriously (or is that something which will come to light when I build the rest of the world?)
Thoughts appreciated- thank you VERY much in advance.
