No need to get so worked up, @Rutin. What @Fulcrum.013 is saying doesn’t make him or her insightful, it simply makes him or her wrong. At one point he or she made this claim:
3 hours ago, Fulcrum.013 said:To understend a task field people need a fundamental basis in math that only university able to give.
Since the above is factually false (where did they learn before universities? Who taught Newton? Since math describes the universe, it is open for exploration equally to all, and it is entirely possible to teach one’s self, even if that means reading a book), @Fulcrum.013 seems to want to take a hard-line stance on what is required to be a programmer for some kind of ego boost, most likely to say, “Grr! I went through the time and money and I can’t accept how much of a waste it is so I will pretend it was the most essential thing in the universe!!”
You should not let someone work you up who has his or her own entirely different set of motives when offering “advice,” and @Fulcrum.013’s goal here is clearly only to shame anyone who was smart enough to follow through with the purpose of school (to get a job) and thus to stop school before it gets needlessly time-consuming and expensive.
It’s just important that the people reading his or her posts realize this as well.
L. Spiro